[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

At least Im not the only one saying IPv6 isnt really deployed.

As you all can see, Only a 5% of Google traffic is v6.

For sure, google is not the only one, but the most used search engine 
and their stats can give us an "external eye" to v6 deploy in the world.

Again, the current v6 deploy makes me cry like a children.

For that reason, I dont support this proposal.

We, as community, must try to foment IPv6 over everything.

If we dont do anything now, we'll pay in near future, when in 10 years 
v4 still being the "main protocol" instead of v6.

Cheers,

-Dani

El 30/11/2014 15:38, Jan Ingvoldstad escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com
> <mailto:randy at psg.com>> wrote:
>
>      > Take a look at
>      > e.g. http://www.vix.at/vix_participants.html?&no_cache=1&L=1, the
>      > column "IPv6 Routeserver activated".
>      >
>      > I presume it wouldn't be useful to have that configured, unless there
>      > is deployment in these ASNs.
>
>     with all due respect, wilfred.  iij has had a backbone configiured for
>     ipv6 since 1997.  but that is anecdote not data.
>
>
> Yep, data is much more useful.
>
> http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
> --
> Jan