This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at v4escrow.net
Tue Aug 26 02:22:42 CEST 2014
Hi, On 25/08/14 14:59, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie > <mailto:nick at inex.ie>> wrote: > > On 25/08/2014 19:47, Gert Doering wrote: > > while I can understand that beaches and drinks are more > attractive than > > policy work, we have a proposal here that needs a bit of caring - > > this one is in Review Phase until Friday, and has received > exactly one > > comment yet (strong support). I could use a *bit* more feedback > here... > > > Whoops, sorry about that! > > Beach-and-drink time was over a month ago! some are still at the beach :) > > > tl;dr: don't support as-is, but could be convinced > > -- > > I support the idea as it's a bugfix policy proposal, but the > wording is > need to be improved. At the moment, it ties the policy to the > idea of the > RIPE NCC being the routing police. Probably this isn't the intention. > > > I think you're right about that. I would go as far as to say, as long as you have/use IPv6 (no matter which color and from whom) you can request the last /22. I would also accept a change proposal that would completely remove this requirement and believe it's even a better idea. > > > It may be better to consider alternative wording, e.g. > > > An allocation will only be made to a LIR if the LIR has already been > > assigned or allocated an IPv6 address block from a RIR. > > Even better, remove the requirement completely as it's pointless. > +1 > > I'm not convinced that it's a pointless requirement, but I concur that > the wording needs to be changed a bit before I feel comfortable with it. > > As it is, however, I don't feel strongly either way about this part of > the policy, but a clearer policy is something I'll support. :) > -- > Jan Kind regards, Elvis -- <http://v4escrow.net> Elvis Daniel Velea Chief Business Analyst Email: elvis at V4Escrow.net <mailto:elvis at v4escrow.net> US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914 EU Phone: +3 (161) 458 1914 Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140825/15a240de/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo.png Type: image/png Size: 5043 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140825/15a240de/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1.png Type: image/png Size: 11971 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140825/15a240de/attachment-0001.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]