This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Sat Aug 16 17:59:04 CEST 2014
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote: > 2) We limited the number of AS Number assignments per LIR to one > thousand. This currently values an AS Number assignment at roughly 2 > euros, which in my opinion would be a fine number. This approach would > have both an abuse-dampening and a garbage collection effect. I do agree with the aim of the proposal and while I don't see the same potential for abuse as Nick does, mainly because I see no real use or value in having a myriad of ASNs just lying around. Reinstating the 50€/year scheme may make sense, here. As to the option above, at first glance 1000 seems like a lot, but without supporting data, it's hard to tell. Requiring, and verifying, documentation after X ASN may be an option, but this feels like a bandaid where the simple fee used to be. Richard PS: For Gert's benefit: I support this proposal in its current form already, even though there's still room for improvement.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]