[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 two cents on multi homing ASN requirement

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Erik Bais wrote:

> Policy can't set a price or affect the cost to a resource, as that is
> decided by the membership in the AGM. 

Yes I know, hence my presenting of these two paths forward.

> I would rather have the NCC monitor the situation and report on it
> during the NCC services update on the RIPE meetings as they are also
> doing on the PI IPv6 without multihoming.  If the situation would show
> abusive behaviour from people, the need is there to associate a cost
> per AS object and you would get it much easier through the AGM ... 
> 
> I would not recommend writing a policy that would only be implemented
> after a cost decision. And by writing that the Currently policy must
> stay as is, also doesn't leave an option to make other adjustments.. 

Noted.

> May I suggest the policy change that was discussed to be able to
> transfer an ASn. 

Do you have an URL?

What about the option 2, to limit the amount of AS assignments per
LIR to 1000? As far as I understand option would fall within APWG's
mandate and address the raised concerns.

Kind regards,

Job