This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Wed Aug 6 12:44:53 CEST 2014
Andreas, I think you perfectly understand that the RIPE services are not restricted by this EU directive. And this is GOOD. Why shall anybody create a hole in the map? A hole in the map would create less conflicts or more??? Allowing people talk to others creates less danger than not allowing! Thanks, Géza On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Frackowiak <af at ins.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.07.2014 13:04, schrieb ksyu at netassist.ua: > > lets see this article > > > > > http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.226.01.0002.01.ENG > > Interesting. > > ------------ > 2.Annex III shall include key equipment and technology related to the > creation, acquisition or development of infrastructure in the following > sectors: (..) (b) telecommunications; (...) > > (...) > 3.It shall be prohibited to: > > (a)provide, directly or indirectly, technical assistance or brokering > services related to the key equipment and technology listed in Annex > III, or related to the provision, manufacture, maintenance and use of > items listed in Annex III to any natural or legal person, entity or body > in Crimea or Sevastopol or for use in Crimea or Sevastopol; and > (...) > --------------- > > To my understanding, IP-numbers are kind of "key technology" for > telecommunications and so the RIPE services shall fall under this EU > directive. > > However, Annex III does not list (yet) anything directly IP related, > so the RIPE sevices seem not to fall unders this EU directive. > > Someone should tell the EU, that this new internet-thingy is kind of a > key technology for telecommunications. > > I do not think that RIPE should make its own policy/politics in this > issue but should just follow the law. > > Greetings > Andreas > > > > 29.07.2014 16:45, Richard Hartmann пишет: > >> Dmitriy, all, > >> > >> > >> as has been stated repeatedly, this is not the place for this > discussion. > >> > >> The initial question was "will RIPE NCC hand resources to a LIR in > >> Crimea, based on Russian papers" and the clear answer is "if said > >> papers establish the existence of the LIR and substantiate the LIR's > >> claims, yes". > > -- > INS GmbH www.ins.de > Gaswerkstraße 64 D-44575 Castrop-Rauxel > Tel: +49 2305 101 0 Fax: +49 2305 101 155 > Geschäftsführung: Andreas Frackowiak > Alle Angebote sind unverbindlich. AG Dortmund: HRB 17064 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140806/bd4ee9fb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Crimea papers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]