This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Support of https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Wed Apr 30 19:30:13 CEST 2014
On 30 April 2014 14:28, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03 > Other than the use cases suggested in the document (which could be achieved using private ASNs) is there a reason for this that I'm missing? With other discussions about recovering non globally routed ASNs this just seem odd J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 New Policy Proposal (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Support of https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]