This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Wed Apr 16 14:20:04 CEST 2014
On 16 April 2014 13:13, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote: > And if it turns out that we _need_ more than the absolute reserve of IPv4, > we will have less wiggle room. How about we just carve out all the existing IPv4 space, hand it out to all LIRs that are extant on the 1st November 2014 and then IPv6 would be the only way forward and people can scramble to get themselves an LIR before the 1st if they really think they are going to need v4 space ever in the future? The world's not fair, networks need to move on.. J ps For the avoidance of doubt "There is a level of British sarcasm hidden in this email" -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]