[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> We've consciously decided that our last-/8 policy is a "no return" policy,
> to ensure new entrants in the market can still have *some* IPv4, even if
> they come in 5 years or 10 years time from now.
>
> If you think you can convince the community that we should now go and
> change it back, well, this is what the policy development process is for
> - but I don't think the chances are good.  Of course everyone wants more
> IPv4 addresses, but nobody wants anyone *else* to take away those last
> bits from him...
>

I am a bit late to the game, but I think this is the perfect summary and I
would be forced to argue and vote against any policy proposal which wants
to change the status quo regarding last /8.


Sorry,
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140415/aed50316/attachment.html>