[address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation

> deployments.  Now, before the big discussion starts: there is other 
> gear in the market that scales up to 2 million, etc., but I wanted to
> point out that these are real-world hard limits, and the amount of "headroom"
> we have between "what is out there today" (500k) and "what some of the
> fairly widely deployed core routers can do today" (700k) is not so big 
> that we want to risk an explosion by factor 2.
> 
> Gert Doering
>        — NetMaster

Hi all,

New to list contributions but thought I’d simply add a +1 to this. As a network operator that just recently had to make significant changes in our core network to cope with the fact that the routing table is currently circa 500k I would be supportive of any policy that maintains /22 as a minimum. 

Mick