This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Apr 8 21:41:13 CEST 2014
Hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:34:10PM +0100, Tom Norda wrote: > I know a RIPE member with an unused ipv4 /20 block not used in the last > 2 years and i'm wondering if that's a RIPE community policy violation. I > checked https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/current-ripe-documents/ripe-policiesbut > i still have doubts if it is accepted or not. If it's an allocation, it's not a violation. There is no clause about returning allocations if you don't meet your growth estimates. gert -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140408/21930b2a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] report address policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] About the /22 allocation limitation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]