This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Mon Sep 30 23:45:23 CEST 2013
Hi, On 9/30/13 6:47 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 30/09/2013 17:41, Tore Anderson wrote: >> Then you would have only one path and no confusion: >> >> RIR[RIPE NCC] -> LIR -> End User > > you would have confusion about who the address space holder was and what > the end user's rights and obligations were to the ripe ncc. If you're > going to suggest this, talk to the RIPE NCC legal eagles because it's a > difficult area. > > Nick I agree Nick, however, Tore does have a point, we may have to find a definition to the current holder of PI. This organisation will now be able to sub-allocate and will essentially become a 'sub-lir' cheers, elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]