This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 23:46:46 CEST 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Elvis Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: > I do think that these terms do need to be defined, and the policy text was > the best place for the definitions (in my opinion). Where else would you see > them? Personally, I would like to see a single, canonical, authorative document defining _all_ special terms. In a perfect world, those special terms would then be Always Capitalized When Used Within Documents or MAYBE EVEN ALL UPPER CASE. If there's any interest, I would be willing to spear-head and/or collaborate on this effort. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]