[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)

Hi,

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:25:34PM +0200, Sylvain Vallerot wrote:
> OK, let me reword our position then.
[..]
> We do not oppose to the principle of allocation transfers despite we
> might not be in full accordance with its current terms. But we are not
> welcoming deregulation.

Who is "our" and "we" here, specifically?  On this list, *individuals*
voice their opinions...

(Though I'm starting to get tempted to request full disclosure of anyone
who is directly affiliated with a regional registry, as when judging
consensus, I'm going to look very closely at contributions from RIR
employees, board members, etc. from different regions that operate in
a very different situation as far as remaining IPv4 address space is 
concerned.)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130922/fa018fc0/attachment.sig>