[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)

Think I'll just "hijack" this discussion ;p

I fully support the idea of uniting PI and PA into one policy, it's
just numbers anyway.


However, the presentation on the topic from the three (just two
onsite) volunteers was very interesting, the consequences and how much
it affected was amazing. How did we dig us into such a mess?

With that background I don't think we can continue forward on the
started track, the impact everywhere and amount of work are too big.
I think we should take two step back and cleanup the mess inside the
PI "domain", try to clean and polish it, link it toward reality, all
the things that are connected and linked. Not so much about changing
alot, just clean it up. Or we can fix what's obvious broken along the
way of course.

We should also do the same on the PA side, but probably not that much
there to clean up. And this should be done both for v4 and v6 before
we again in a year or two try to unite it into one great policy.



anyhow, as long as we don't drag this mess over into v6 the future
isn't all that bad:-)


just my 0,02 NOK :-)

--- Roger J ---

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dmitriy Zemlyanoy
<dmitriy at deltahost.com.ua> wrote:
> RIPE 67 is ended.
> Just wondering if you have any updates?
>
>
>
>> We will be addressing this as part of our "Feedback From RIPE NCC
>> Registration Services"
>> presentation at RIPE 67. Based on the feedback we receive from here, we
>> will work with
>> the Working Group Chairs on a way forward.
>> Kind regards,
>> Andrea Cima
>> RIPE NCC



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no