This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2013100901002562] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian Hardy
A.Hardy at e-quest.nl
Wed Oct 9 09:17:12 CEST 2013
Hi all, I think this subject was covered on this list earlier this year in the thread named; “Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space”. I’m just not sure what the status is right now? Do we really need to restart the discussion? Regards, Adrian [cid:image113dcb.PNG at f7d5beb6.4a8a3d8c] e-Quest | Adrian Hardy Technical Consultant T: +31 492 392626 | Support: +31 492 780780 Schootense Dreef 26 | 5708 HZ | Helmond KVK:17121883 | BTW:8009998348B01 | http://www.e-quest.nl Van: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] Namens ksyu at netassist.ua Verzonden: woensdag 9 oktober 2013 01:35 Aan: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Onderwerp: [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer) Hello everybody I would like to draw attention of the public to the next moment . According to the RIPE policy, a PI network should be used only as it was assigned. However, the time comes, the amount of clients increases, the number of services is growing up, and v4 addresses are not assigned any more. What should provider do in this case? The network was assigned for the particular service and can't be used for other services? Just returned back . But no one in their right mind will do this ) . It may be a topical solution for this situation - to return the opportunity to transfer PI blocks into the PA? This will give the opportunity to breathe more freely, not to violate the rules of RIPE policy . I suggest to discuse the question of transference of PI blocks to PA, and invite all caring to speak on the matter. Best regards, Kseniya Sokol -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131009/62861543/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image113dcb.PNG Type: image/png Size: 34020 bytes Desc: image113dcb.PNG URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131009/62861543/attachment.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2013100901002562] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]