[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:18:15AM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> However: the current policy for IPv6 PI assignments specifies
> "Assignments will be made from a separate 'designated block' to
> facilitate filtering practices.". Is that worth keeping?

I find it useful.  If only to help my scripts in building my routing
table pictures (http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/weekly/) to find 
"outliers" - I tag address space blocks as "PI" or "IXP" or "DNS root",
and then I normally do not need to do anything for new prefixes showing
up, as opposed to "oh, a new /48, let's go to the RIPE DB and see what
flavour it is".

(Now, the "PI" category would not be named as such anymore, but it
would still be "the small type of prefix" and as such worth to keep
track on a separate line)

Gert Doering
        -- speaking as IPv6 statistics geek
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131007/7cc4aa4a/attachment.sig>