[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
> For example, you can use a /64 to number, let's say, 100 devices that 
> are in the same vlan doing the same thing and providing the same service 
> but you can not number 100 different customers within a /64.

But do we want to state that?  In web hosting environments, it's not
uncommon to have 100 different customers on the very same hardware, each
of them using a different IP(v6) address - and with vserver/jail type
setups, each of them is typically only using a single address (unlike VM
style setups where you might want to use "more").

Do we mandate (or even "encourage") using 100 different /64s for that 
purpose?  I'd say "no" :-) - let the ISP do that if they *want*, but 
do not *mandate* it.

Gert Doering
        -- speaking as someone who also runs a network
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131004/02850b59/attachment.sig>