This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RFC7020: The Internet Numbers Registry System
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RFC7020: The Internet Numbers Registry System
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RFC7020: The Internet Numbers Registry System
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hph at oslo.net
Wed Oct 2 18:11:56 CEST 2013
On 02.10.13 15:11, Gert Doering wrote: > I find the question a bit strange, given that the IETF doesn't make > local or global policies, and the RIRs' local communities' bottom-up > processes are not really affected by documents published elsewhere... It could be if local or global policies refer to RFC2050 - it should be replaced - carefully. (a search on ripe.net for RFC 2050 gives 213 hits - Advanced search returns 21 hits in Policy and Draft and Current 9 in best common practice 2 in help documents. So I think at least some housekeeping is needed...) -- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RFC7020: The Internet Numbers Registry System
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RFC7020: The Internet Numbers Registry System
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]