[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Elvis Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 10/1/13 9:43 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Sascha Luck <lists-ripe at c4inet.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:22:52PM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are only two paths, from the RIPE NCC to LIR and from the RIPE NCC
>>>> to End user (we may decide to change the name) via the Sponsoring LIR.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be in favour of converting all resources into "independent
>>> resources" and the path going, in all cases:
>>>
>>> RIR -> Sponsoring LIR -> End User.
>
> [...]
>
>> You're talking about a quite radical changes to how we think of IP space.
>
>
> Correct, current proposal is quite a radical change. However, it does not
> change much the reality today.
>
> Companies do request /48 PI assignments saying that they will use it only
> for their infrastructure and then start giving bits of it to customers
> without actually registering the assignment/sub-allocation and basically
> violating the policy.
>
>
>> What you're hinting at are not that difficult from something we're
>> discussing
>> on IETF level, and in the concept of LISP. Get a new block of address
>> space
>> that will be distributed directly to end-users. It's just IP space.
>>
>
> LISP is a totally different story. Let's not mix them up, please :-)

Think you missed that my reply was to Sasha's mail, not the propasal
as a whole:)




-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no