This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Oct 1 11:54:31 CEST 2013
Hi Nick, On 10/1/13 10:56 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 30/09/2013 23:58, Elvis Velea wrote: >> the billing issue is the responsibility of the RIPE NCC _members_ :-) > > you can't sweep this under the carpet. Billing is the only thing that > matters to the vast majority of resource holders. I'm not, I'm just trying to have the discussion in the mailing list that can actually take that decision. So, we can propose to the AGM to possibly change the charging scheme, it's just that we first need to come up with real numbers and 2-3 options from which to choose. And I think that the policy proposal should move forward regardless of the billing matters. I also think that the discussion about billing related to this policy proposal to take place in the members-discuss, the only place where suggestions can be made and discussed by the ones that will vote. > > Nick > my .02€ cheers, elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-06 New Policy Proposal (PA/PI Unification IPv6 Address Space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]