This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Stanislav
ms at uakom.sk
Tue May 28 10:16:54 CEST 2013
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote: > > A draft of the policy document is now online and ready for community > review at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/readability/improving-the-readability-of-ripe-documents May I suggest to omit the first occurence of "Only" in the section "2.1 Definitions" to keep to text more self-contained? Currently proposed text: Only the inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”. Suggested change: The inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”. Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]