This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 01:39:16 CET 2013
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-582, "IPv4 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now > available for discussion. I support this proposal. Three cosmetic comments; it would be nice if they could be incorporated. If not, they should _not_ hold up this process in any way. * "In the event that this /16 remains unused at the time the remaining addresses covered by this policy has been distributed, it returns to the pool to be distributed as per section 5.1, and this section is to be automatically deleted from the policy document." should read "have been distributed", instead. * "IXPs holding other PI IPv4 space for their peering LAN (i.e. they are seeking a larger assignment), must return their old peering LAN resources back to this pool within 180 days of assignment." uses IXP once and Internet Exchange [Pp]oint otherwise. Might clean that up just as well. Similarly, "Internet Exchange point" should be replaced with "Internet Exchange Point" * "Clear contractual arrangements are recommended and are mandatory for PA space." This could be worded more clearly. Are they recommended generally, but mandatory for PA? If yes, PI have contractual requirements as well so this could be mentioned here as well. An alternative interpretation would be that contracts are both mandatory and recommended for PA space which would be somewhat nonsensical. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]