This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Tue Mar 26 12:39:45 CET 2013
* boggits > On 26 March 2013 08:47, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Tore Anderson wrote: >> >>> So imagine you're an LIR. You've just spent 1 million euros on a >>> good-as-new /16. What on Earth would cause you to then go ahead and «assign >>> it without any control»? >> >> Exactly. > > Because I can get 4 million by breaking it into smaller chunks at a > higher per unit cost... The LIR holding the original allocation could do the exact same thing, so what is the damage inflicted on the RIPE community and membership here? IMHO it would is much more likely that a original LIR would do something like this, rather than a "middleman LIR", because such a middleman LIR will need to wait 24 months before it can start selling the smaller chunks on to other LIRs. -- Tore Anderson
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]