This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 22:49:11 CET 2013
Would existing RIPE policy and practice allow the transfer of non-RSA legacy space currently registered in the ARIN database to a recipient in the RIPE region? The policy text would seem to allow it: "Any LIR is allowed to re-allocate complete or partial blocks of IPv4 address space that were previously allocated to them by either the RIPE NCC or the IANA." I guess it might require an ERX-style transfer of the original IANA assignment to RIPE's administrative control first? Has anyone attempted such a transfer yet, I wonder? -Scott On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote: > OK. Your point is clearer now. But my understanding is that ARIN has no > authority over transfers from a truly "legacy" (i.e., non-contracted) > holder. If such a legacy holder wants to transfer to RIPE region without > ARIN needs assessment, they can if RIPE allows it. ARIN will fuss and > bluster about it, but so what?**** > > ** ** > > The more important point is indeed the interaction between ARIN and RIPE. > It is the combination of RIPE being empty and ARIN still having a free > pool that makes for an "intermediate" state, and makes it difficult to > reconcile the goals of 2013-03 with the desire to make sure all inter-RIR > transfers out of the ARIN region continue to be needs-based.**** > > ** ** > > If the RIPE community thinks that eliminating needs justification > bureaucracy is a higher priority than getting access to transfers of > less-expensive legacy address space from the ARIN region (due to greater > supply of underutilized addresses there), then I agree that passing 2013-03 > would be appropriate. But I would predict that doing so will prevent any > implementation of inter-RIR transfers from the ARIN region to the RIPE > region until after (possibly well after) ARIN's free pool is exhausted.*** > * > > ** ** > > -Scott**** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130325/2e9de726/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]