This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Mon Mar 25 19:26:00 CET 2013
> > In other words: if you sell address space you obviously don't need it. False, as a blanket assumption. Obvious counter-scenario: You need a /16 but hold a /8. You sell the entire /8 due to the premium it commends as a contiguous block but then buy a /16. > > If this WG wants 2013-03 and transfers from ARIN are the only argument > against 2013-03 then it might be a solution to add this bit of (IMHO) common > sense for those who want to transfer addresses from the ARIN region. > > But I am just suggesting options for the WG. I'll stay out of the discussion and > let the community (to all who are reading this: that includes you!) decide :-) > > Cheers, > Sander >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]