[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Tore Anderson wrote:

>> The cleanest, and most radical, solution would of course be to say
>> "addresses are addresses" and do away with the difference between PI and
>> PA and strip all references the "PA" and "PI" from the policy and RIPE DB.
>
> I've heard talk about such a «PA/PI unification» proposal, at least for
> IPv6, but I don't think anything was ever actually submitted to the PDP.
> I would prefer that such a change could be proposed and discussed
> independently of 2013-03, though. That said: The eventual passing of
> 2013-03 would be a great benefit to such a proposal, as the amount of
> policy text that needs to be changed would decrease dramatically.
>
> See also:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2011-October/006496.html

Yes. Mayby we have what we have with IPv4 but I support Gert in the 
attempts of bringing som order to the IPv6 space.


Regards,

Daniel Stolpe

_________________________________________________________________________________
Daniel Stolpe           Tel:  08 - 688 11 81                   stolpe at resilans.se
Resilans AB             Fax:  08 - 55 00 21 63            http://www.resilans.se/
Box 13 054							      556741-1193
103 02 Stockholm