This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer policy limits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Mar 13 12:48:11 CET 2013
>> what if the buyer has contracted to support the sub-allocation? > The transfer policy explicitly says 'empty PA'. But in the case you > describe it might be possible to do this through the > mergers/acquisitions procedures someone has a critical, very hard and slow to move (think dns or something), service in the middle of a chunk of address space they sell. the sales agreement does something kinky to make that service stay up. this is not a merger. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Transfer policy limits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]