This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed Jun 26 12:06:40 CEST 2013
On Jun 26, 2013 11:25 AM, "Wilfried Woeber" <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > > In general I support the recycling of AS #s, > but for operational and consistency reasons I'd be a bit more careful... There is no shortage of ASn so we have the luxury of being able to be _very_ careful. Even after an ASn had been reclaimed we can easily wait a significant period of time before recycling them. Richard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130626/a8f76684/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]