This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Opteamax GmbH
ripe at opteamax.de
Thu Jun 20 15:29:42 CEST 2013
On 20.06.2013 13:28, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Andrea, all - > > full ACK to both: > > * Allow status change from LIRs' PI assignments to PA allocations > > and to Tore's point: > > * Omission of the minimum allocation size constraint > Full +1 from my side. from ripe perspective the only difference I can see is the fact that PI is charged seperately. I clearly remember the (funny mentioned) words at last GM: "we are already trying hard to make a deficit, but obviously we failed again" ... so allowing new LIR to migrate there PI into PA could be at least a way to reduce the income ;) Regards -- Jens Ott Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team Jens Ott Opteamax GmbH Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: jo at opteamax.de HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]