This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 22, Issue 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Jun 12 11:05:51 CEST 2013
Peter Koch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber wrote: [...] > Therefore I formally object to 2013-04 being elevated into the next PDP phase. Fair enough, and I do see where you are coming from :-) But at least we started to discuss the mess around this rather wide and diverse topic. :-) I'll come back to Erik's reply separately, but *technically* I am not so much worried now about what the formal "wrapper" is, but rather to *eventually* get a hold of the architectural aspects of issuing certificates to the holders of *all* resources, irrespective of their "colour" - if at all. At least for me, it *does* make a difference, policy- and support-wise, if the implementation is "reasonable" or adds more grief. > -Peter Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 22, Issue 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]