[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)

* Tore Anderson

>> I may be just one person who thinks we should still mention in the
>> resulting document that RIPE Community cares about networks, that we
>> do realise that IPs are for networks and that these are expected to
>> be used with care and responsibility.
> 
> I can tell you with absolute certainty that you are not the only one.
> This statement describes me, too, and for the record I operate both a
> network and an LIR.

Uhm, apologies, I misread your original statement there Filiz. So to
clarify, I do *not* think 2013-03 needs to add a statement saying that
the RIPE Community cares about networks and so forth. After all, the
current document makes no such statement either.

What I thought you said first was that *you* was one person in the RIPE
Community that cares about networks and so forth. That was what I wanted
to agree with because I care about networks too. :-)

In any case, I would be quite willing to discuss a separate proposal,
independent from 2013-03, that added a statement along those lines.


Tore