[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space

I think we should consider to remove the distinction between PI and PA.
As the free pool is depleted I do no loger see this need for registry
purposes.

-hph

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013, Nigel Titley wrote:

> On 16/07/2013 22:45, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
>
>> Hi Nigel,
>>
>> On 12.07.2013 18:52, Nigel Titley wrote:
>>
>>> but the
>>> draft board minutes are currently scheduled to go out on Monday (with an
>>> announcement to the members list).
>>>
>>
>> I can't find anything in the minutes concerning a status change of PI
>> space. Or did I miss something somewhere?
>>
>> Thanks and best,
>>
>>  Hmm, yes the discussion we had didn't get formally minuted. Looking back
> on the correspondence on the board mailing list after the meeting, where
> this lack of minuting was brought up, it was decided that as the discussion
> was still taking place on the AP-WG list that we shouldn't bias the
> discussion by minuting the board discussion. Which I've managed to
> completely put my foot in... <sigh>
>
> The upshot was that the Board agreed in principle that they thought that a
> move from PI to PA under the defined circumstances was fine in principle,
> as far as they could see, but that the discussion should run to a close in
> the community before coming to a final conclusion.
>
> Nigel
>
>

-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130717/7b9cb725/attachment.html>