This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anfinsen, Ragnar
Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no
Thu Jan 3 10:43:47 CET 2013
I support this proposal. /Ragnar On 31.12.12 11:12, "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > >Dear Colleagues, > > >A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation >and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > >You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > >We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to ><address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > >Regards > >Emilio Madaio >Policy Development Officer >RIPE NCC > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]