This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Jan 1 19:56:55 CET 2013
On 12/31/12 9:17 PM, Sascha Lenz wrote: > well, I guess that's how it should have been from the beginning. > I do support this small change. I don't think it makes a real difference anyways. Hi, Well, it does make a difference to those who merged different LIRs in one and have multiple IPv6 allocations :) Thnx for all the support from the AP WG, I think that's the right thing to do ;) Cheers and all good in 2013, Jan Zorz
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]