[address-policy-wg] Was : RE: 2012-09 - now : PDP 'I Agree discussion'

On Feb 22, 2013 2:09 PM, "Niall O'Reilly" <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote:

>         (Co-) Chair(s) of the WG where the policy is being developed
could be
>         allowed to take the initiative of declaring on the list that
there were
>         sufficient grounds (for example: overwhelming support in
Discussion Phase
>         and no impact) for considering earlier support as carrying over
into the
>         Review Phase, and that because of this silence would
exceptionally be
>         taken as consent.

I think the current system is designed to make sure such interpretation is
not needed, reducing the chance for errors and misunderstandings.

As Gert pointed out repeatedly, we are dealing with two outliers here
anyway, significantly changing the process just for those seems unwise.

Why not ask all chairs to state explicitly in all their announcements that
new ayes and nays are needed for that specific phase?

Richard

Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130223/27e59668/attachment.html>