[address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:50:41PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 20/02/2013 22:46, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > I wasn't aware that I had to repeat my statement of support for it to
> > still count, but in any case - consider it done.
> 
> It's an oddity of the PDP.  I'm not sure if it serves a useful purpose
> because at the times when there are piles of proposals flying around (e.g.
> now), people end up getting jaded by the requirement for constant acks and
> me-toos.

Yeah, the PDP is a bit heavy on "make sure that there is enough backing
of the community, so nobody sneaks through anything while people are not
looking".  The need for extra input in the review phase is due to the
fact that the proposal text might change between discussion and review
phase, and also due to the impact analysis, which might change someone's
opinion.

Now, for 2012-09 and 2012-10, these are somewhat unusual - overwhelming
support in discussion phase, no textual changes going to review phase, and 
an impact analysis that basically says "no impact" - so I can see that it
feels a bit silly to have to re-state support again.  But thanks anyway :-)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130221/1072008f/attachment.sig>