[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 Proposal Accepted - Request for Clarification

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Sascha Luck <lists-ripe at c4inet.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:55:30PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
>
>> The updated RIPE document is ripe-577 and is available at:
>>
>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-577
>
>
> ripe-577 contains, in S5.5 the sentence:
>
> "Re-allocated blocks will be signed to establish the current allocation
> owner."
>
> What does this refer to? Does this mean these blocks will *mandatorily*
> be signed with a RPKI certificate and, if yes, how does that square with
> the NCC's stated policy that RPKI certs will always be voluntary?

I really hope that's a type or forgotten connection somehow.


-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no