This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: 1, 000 /22 Allocated from Last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2013020401002158] New on RIPE Labs: 1, 000 /22 Allocated from Last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: 1, 000 /22 Allocated from Last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Feb 5 17:21:51 CET 2013
On 04/02/2013 13:13, Shane Kerr wrote: > All, > > On Friday, 2013-02-01 15:09:58 +0100, > Mirjam Kuehne <mir at ripe.net> wrote: >> We allocated the 1,000th /22 from the last /8. Please read more on >> RIPE Labs: >> >> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/ingrid/1000-slash-22s-allocated-from-last-slash-8 > Just so I understand... > > It took 140 days to allocate 1000 addresses, or about 7.14 address > per day. > > There are 2^14 /22 in a /8, or 16384. > > At that burn rate, it will take about 2150 days to finish out the > last /8. > (16384 - 1000) / 7.14 = 2155 > > That's about 6 years, assuming things stay constant. > 2155 / 365.25 = 5.9 > > Based on Google's numbers, IPv6 has roughly doubled as a percentage of > traffic for the last 3 years... if this continues for the next 6 years, > we'll have about 70% of traffic over IPv6 when the RIPE NCC really, > REALLY runs out of IPv4 in this region. (Of course, if it continues for > 7 years then 140% of traffic will be over IPv6.) ;) > > It looks like there's likely to be a window of time where new entrants > won't be able to get any IPv4 space, and a significant percentage of > users will still be IPv4-only. > > Should we tweak the policy now to make it harder to get IPv4 address > space, or wait a few years? It seems slightly unfair to future entrants, > but the whole IPv4 allocation model has always vastly favored early > entrants, so perhaps we shouldn't worry about it yet. > Deckchairs... deckchairs... Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2013020401002158] New on RIPE Labs: 1, 000 /22 Allocated from Last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New on RIPE Labs: 1, 000 /22 Allocated from Last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]