[address-policy-wg] 2013-05 New Policy Proposal (No Restrictions on End User Assignments in Intra-RIR Transfers)

On 16 Aug 2013, at 15:18, Nigel Titley wrote:

> On 16/08/2013 15:14, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> 
>>>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-05/
>> 
>> This is an amendment to the transfer policy which solves real-world 
>> problems for real-world LIRs - namely: abandon the requirement that a
>> transferred block of addresses must be empty, because that conflicts
>> with real-world scenarios, like a customer of a given LIR opening
>> his own LIR later on, both parties agree to transfer the addresses
>> the customer uses to the new LIR (= the customer's LIR of the customer
>> using the addresses already), and the NCC then tells them "no, you 
>> can't do that".
>> 
>> The proposal is in *discussion* phase, so if you want to discuss, now is
>> the time.  (If you just "+1" it, that's also a clear signal :-) ).
>> 
> I think this is actually quite sensible, so +1

	+1 from me too
	/Niall