This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Aug 14 17:08:31 CEST 2013
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Does this need to be handled via a policy change? I.e. has this been > escalated inside the RIPE NCC and if that was unsuccessful, handed over > to the arbitration panel for their opinion? No, that hasn't happened because the person didn't know about it. Personally I dislike a policy that requires someone to know innards of RIPE NCC in order to get reasonable treatment. As far as I can tell, the hostmaster in question didn't offer these alternatives. The only alternatives were "produce documents on original companys letterhead authorizing the transfer" and when the response was that it can't be done (with a reasonable explanation), the only path forward was said to be reclamation of the resource or to become LIR himself. No talk about escalation path or "arbitration panel". How are "normal" people going to know about this? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] regarding housecleaning efforts in absurdum
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]