[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Clean up)

On 8/4/13 14:11 , Tore Anderson wrote:
> * David Farmer
>]
>> And in slightly different words, try goal #1 in section #2 of RFC
>> 2050-bis. See
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-housley-rfc2050bis-02#section-2
>
> ...which happens to contain exactly 0 occurrences of the string "fair".

No the string "fair" isn't there any longer, but the string "operational 
need" didn't go any where, and you asked about "operational need" not 
"fairness";

    1)  Allocation Pool Management: Due to the fixed lengths of IP
        addresses and AS numbers, the pools from which these resources
        are allocated are finite.  As such, allocations must be made in
        accordance with the *operational needs* of those running the
        networks that make use of these number resources and by taking
        into consideration pool limitations at the time of allocation.

Furthermore, from now on I will just use "operational need", since 
people are getting stuck on the issue of verified/justified/valid as 
something that is supposedly new.


-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================