This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Apr 16 10:53:54 CEST 2013
Hi, Tore -- On 30/03/2013 14:01, "Tore Anderson" <tore at fud.no> wrote: >In a nutshell: 2013-03 amputates the dead policy limbs. Cosmetic surgery >can follow later. :-) Cleaning stuff up is good, and this policy is a great step - thanks for bravely taking up the challenge. I support the ambition of the policy, and happy to support the current wording. Richard's English tweaks should be included as well. There was a lot of debate about whether to remove that 'conservation is an aim of the policy' at the start - I would support a 2013-03-bis which does not delete the conservation line if this is required to build consensus, but it's time to delete the legacy stuff. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]