[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)

* Tore Anderson

> * Wilfried Woeber
> 
>> Before formally submitting my statement of support, I'd like to ask
>> for clarification on the proposed text for 6.3, specifically:
>>
>> " ...this should be at least 50% of the space unless special
>> circumstances are defined. "
>>
>> Which party would "define" such "special cicumstances" and which
>> party would review/grant/deny?
> 
> The NCC, I presume...
> 
> I would like to make it very clear that this exact formulation was in
> the original policy document (prior to Run Out Fairly), so it isn't
> anything new. (This is also the case for all other text that this
> proposal adds.)

Oh my. There is a problem here.

See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-03/draft

The formulation you're referring to, is present as «original text». It
was also present in ripe-449. When preparing my proposal, I used the
above page and did the exact opposite.

However, I had overlooked that the ripe-449 had been obsoleted by some
other policy change prior to the implementation of Run Out Fairly. Which
means that my proposal, as currently stated, reverts (parts) of that
other proposal also. That is not the intention of this policy at all. I
will try to have Emilio spin new version that actually reverts the
changes made by Run Out Fairly, and only those.

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/