[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)

* Wilfried Woeber

> Before formally submitting my statement of support, I'd like to ask
> for clarification on the proposed text for 6.3, specifically:
> 
> " ...this should be at least 50% of the space unless special
> circumstances are defined. "
> 
> Which party would "define" such "special cicumstances" and which
> party would review/grant/deny?

The NCC, I presume...

I would like to make it very clear that this exact formulation was in
the original policy document (prior to Run Out Fairly), so it isn't
anything new. (This is also the case for all other text that this
proposal adds.)

See:

Maybe Alex or someone else from the NCC could shed some light on how
this part of the policy was interpreted prior to the implementation of
Run Out Fairly?

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/