[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 Discussion Period extended until 22 October 2012 (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)

Thank you for your comments Tore.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I support this proposal, but wonder why it specifically refers to LIRs
rather than something generic like ?organisations?? That excludes
transfers of direct assignments to/from End Users [who are not also
LIRs]. In other places, the text refers to ?any IPv4 address space?,
which seems to indicate that direct assignments are in scope, too.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I am quite willing to change the wording from LIR's to Organizations if
all agree.
Then all five transfer examples defined by Tore would be allowed.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, an editorial/language feedback:

?Apart from transfers of address space within the service region of the
RIPE NCC, this policy defines the framework that outlines what specific
rules apply to IPv4 address space transfers in between the different RIR
regions.?
---------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with Tore's editorial change.  This sentence will now read:

This policy defines the framework that outlines specific rules which
apply
to IPv4 address space transfer between the RIR regions.

Thank you.

Sandra Brown
IPv4 Market Group
sandrabrown at ipv4marketgroup.com