This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE 553 & last /8 <-> Anycast assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 553 & last /8 <-> Anycast assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 553 & last /8 <-> Anycast assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Sep 18 13:12:57 CEST 2012
Clarification: my question below only regards IPv4 Anycast assignments, of course. Best, Carsten On 18.09.2012 11:50, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > All - > > as I have just discussed this privately with a colleague: is it the case > that as a side effect of section 5.6 "Use of last /8 for PA Allocations" > of RIPE 553: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-553#-----use-of-last-8-for-pa-allocations > > > there won't be any more Anycast assignments following section 6.9 > "Anycasting TLD and Tier 0/1 ENUM Nameservers" of this policy: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-553#-----anycastying-tld-and-tier-1-enum-nameservers > > > either? > > As such 'Assignments for authoritative TLD or ENUM Tier 0/1 DNS lookup > services are subject to the policies described in the RIPE Document > entitled "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource > Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region"' as this section states. > > I tried various ways of interpretation, but failed to come to terms > eventually. > > Any hints, anyone? > > Thanks and best, > > Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 553 & last /8 <-> Anycast assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE 553 & last /8 <-> Anycast assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]