This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hamed Shafaghi
hamed at skydsl.ir
Fri Sep 14 16:20:00 CEST 2012
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!! On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Andrea Cima <andrea at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Regarding the comments on allocations in the run-up to reaching the last > /8, we would like to assure you that all requests are met with the highest > level of care and due diligence. We do not make public the details of > specific requests or the documentation provided by our members, but we are > happy to explain the procedures used when evaluating these requests. > > All allocations and assignments are evaluated in accordance with RIPE > Policy and full documentation is required before a request is approved. The > relevant policies are listed in ripe-556, "Due Diligence for the Quality of > the RIPE NCC Registration Data": > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/**docs/ripe-556<https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-556> > > By default, all large Internet resource requests (/15 or larger for PA > IPv4, /18 or larger for PI IPv4 and /28 or larger for IPv6) are evaluated > by: > - Two IP Resource Analysts (IPRAs) > - The Registration Services Manager > - The Policy Development Officer > - At least two Senior Managers > > In Phase 1 of reaching the last /8, every request for IPv4 address space > is evaluated by two IPRAs, regardless of the size of the request. > > We would also like to note that requests for IPv4 address space are > handled in strict order of receipt by the next available IPRA. > > Further information on the procedures followed by the RIPE NCC to ensure > correct and consistent evaluations of resource requests is available at: > http://www.ripe.net/internet-**coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/** > last-8-phases<http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/last-8-phases> > http://ripe64.ripe.net/**presentations/168-NCC-**Services-final.pdf<http://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/168-NCC-Services-final.pdf> > http://ripe63.ripe.net/**presentations/137-end-game.pdf<http://ripe63.ripe.net/presentations/137-end-game.pdf> > > If you have any questions on the RIPE NCC's procedures in the run-up to > reaching the last /8, please feel free to contact me. > > Best regards, > Andrea Cima > Registration Services > RIPE NCC > > > -- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed at skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120914/df1a8d42/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]