[address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...

It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP
address for next three months but my company after giving all requested
statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!!


On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Hamed,
>
> Yes, it's a lottery!
>
> Sorry that you didn't win.
>
> I didn't either, tried to get a PI out. :)  But didn't get it.
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:47 +0430, Hamed Shafaghi wrote:
> > It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP
> > address for next three months but my company after giving all
> > requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14
> > subnet!!!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >         On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:56 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >         > The delegated-ripencc-extended-latest shows which blocks
> >         were free at the start of the day, then it's just a matter of
> >         some whois queries to figure out the rest.
> >         >
> >         > Right now it seems 128.0.107.0-128.0.111.255 are still free,
> >         plus those five /24s out of 192/8 I listed earlier. And maybe
> >         those /25+es (didn't check as I'm on the road at the moment).
> >         So it's pretty much all gone now.
> >         >
> >         > Tore
> >
> >
> >         Right, as per the announcements [1][2] as well, we're
> >         officially in
> >         final /8 land now, and IPRAs ran the "available pool" down to
> >         the
> >         ground.
> >
> >         So, somewhere between 35-60M EUR locked up for the RIPE NCC
> >         now, from
> >         one-shot-LIRs, with current policy. Does the RIPE NCC need all
> >         this
> >         money or will that complicate things, especially w.r.t IPv4 as
> >         an asset
> >         issues?  Or does it matter what we do?
> >
> >         IPv4 just became an asset in this land regardless. :-)
> >
> >         Best,
> >         Martin
> >
> >         [1]
> >
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000615.html
> >         [2]
> >
> https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-ipv4-address-space-from-the-last-8
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I Hamed Shafaghi I
> > I Managing Director I
> >
> > I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed at skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I
>
>
>


-- 
I Hamed Shafaghi I
I Managing Director I

I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed at skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120914/0b495376/attachment.html>