This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Tue Sep 11 13:54:45 CEST 2012
* James Blessing > On 11 September 2012 12:02, Tore Anderson > <tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com> wrote: > >> A) join the NCC with 64 LIRs, each getting a /22 allocation at a total >> cost of €112.000, or >> B) get 256 /24 PI assignments at a price of €12.800. >> >> The B option is actually affordable. At €0.20 per address, it's way >> cheaper than what Microsoft paid for the second-hand Nortel addresses, >> for instance (US$11.25 per address IIRC). > > and option A is less than e2.00 per year so excellent value for money > if you compare it to the MS price Absolutely. I don't dispute that this can happen the «multiple LIRs» way, regardless of 2012-04. My worry is mainly that 2012-04, when combined with the current pricing model, will greatly exacerbate the problem. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]