This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Sep 11 12:05:22 CEST 2012
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52:10AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: >* Joins the NCC - becomes a LIR >* Makes 1 initial allocation request - gets a /22 >* Makes 1 PA assignment request (to itself) > >Cost: ?1750 > >Or: > >* Makes 1 PI assignment request [through a sponsoring LIR] > >Cost: ?50 But they can do this now. In fact it's always been possible to game that system, regardless of ipv4 run-out. Assuming this is not a widespread problem now, why would it become one? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]